Anti Constitutional Convention Groups

As wealthy special interests groups increase their efforts, constitutional rights and public interest groups stand in opposition to an Article V convention that could rewrite the U.S. Constitution Today 230 national, state, and local groups are releasing a letter in opposition to calls to convene a new constitutional convention. The letter focuses on the threat of a “ runaway convention, ” where every American's constitutional rights and protections could be at risk. Under Article V of the U.S. Constitution, a convention can be called when two-thirds of the states ( 34 ) petition for a convention to enact amendments to the constitution. Most legal scholars agree that all 34 applications must be on one issue, but once a convention is called anything could be brought up. Our first and only constitutional convention took place in 1787.

More than 200 organizations oppose calls for new constitutional convention, warn of   dangers 04.14.2017 / 3:17 PM Media Contact David Vance As wealthy special interests groups increase their efforts, constitutional rights and public interest groups stand in opposition to an Article V convention that could rewrite the U.S. Constitution Today 230 national, state, and local groups are releasing a letter in opposition to calls to convene a new constitutional convention. The letter focuses on the threat of a “ runaway convention, ” where every American ’s constitutional rights and protections could be at risk. A constitutional convention call, even on a single issue will become a Pandora ’s box – Our first and only constitutional convention took place in 1787.

( 2 ) via email at votingsystemguidelines@eac.gov. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement among a number of states to award all their Electoral College votes to the winner of the national popular vote. States enter the compact by passing enabling legislation through their state legislatures. ( The Constitution gives states the authority to select and govern their electors. ) The Compact is triggered when states equaling at least 270 Electoral College votes enact the legislation. Currently, 14 states and the District of Columbia — representing 189 electoral votes — have passed the NPVIC: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. January 3, 2019 To Rewrite The Constitution.

our U.S. Constitution The undersigned organizations and individuals stand in defense of our U.S. Constitution, and oppose all attempts under its Article V to convene a new constitutional convention (" Con Con" ). State legislation is being pushed by undisclosed donors to force Congress to convene a Con Con supposedly" to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government." Such a convention would open the door to eliminate border security. Second Amendment groups like the Gun Owners of America fully oppose it. Reducing federal power to secure our borders, as invited by the Convention of States legislation, would impose billions of dollars in new costs on states. Conclusion " Thank you.

Tweet South Carolina governor Henry McMaster does not support calling a convention of states to address changes to the U.S. Constitution. My concern is there could be unintended consequences, ” McMaster said, according to a tweet from Lovegrove. Not surprisingly, Templeton ’s campaign wasted little time taking a dig at McMaster … Catherine prefers to stand with the people of South Carolina, Jim DeMint, and conservatives instead of Henry McMaster and Democrats. Or abolishing the Electoral College? We think not … The rest – 36.1 percent – were undecided. ” That ’s true … “ Developing … * CLICK HERE. Want to support what we ’re doing? SUBSCRIBE HERE. Banner:

An Article V Constitutional Convention ( Con-Con ) is an Urgent Threat to Your Rights Since 1787, America has chosen to avoid the risk of a new convention that could rewrite our Constitution and Bill of Rights. But 28 state legislatures have now applied for a convention. The Constitution's Article V says that if 2/3 of the states apply ( 34 states ), Congress shall call a convention for proposing amendments. We're asking local, state, and federal elected officials across the country: In about one minute, please tell us why you support constitutional enforcement over a constitutional convention. See their videos...

Stop a Constitutional Convention Action Tools [ Left and Right ] Working Together to Rewrite the Constitution PDF Download attachments: Con-Con Info Packet-Copy Into Email & Send Download attachments: Rebuttal of Goldwaters' 10 Points' Download attachments: Levin's Risky Proposal-A Constitutional Convention ( PDF ) Download attachments: How the Compact for America Threatens the Constitution PDF Download attachments: States Should Enforce Not Revise the Constitution.pdf Download attachments:

Hold on to the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world. We the people. ” The BBA Does Not Limit Spending Just how would a Balanced Budget Amendment limit spending if there are no limits to spending specified in the amendment? The unconstitutional spending is horrendous. How naïve can people be? Unalienable God-Given Rights Unalienable and natural rights are rights that all people have at birth. ” The U.S. Constitution does not mention “ unalienable ” or “ natural rights. But the first 10 amendments to the Constitution list the basic rights of Americans. ” The New American ’s “ The framers ( of the Constitution ) have simply been too shrewd for us. ” How about that, huh? © 2018

The essence of our concern and why Oklahoma defeated the Article V convention this year [ was ] that this would be a runaway convention. Meanwhile, the Texas legislature was having its own fierce battle over several Article V convention applications. On May 12, 2015, three Oklahoma state legislators created a video to help persuade Texas legislators to defeat the Article V convention agenda in their state. The Texas legislature did go on to reject all Article V convention applications in its 2015 session. What Is an Article V Convention? , Congress shall call such a convention. Congress would send any amendments proposed by the convention to the states for ratification ( three-fourths of the states are required ).

“ ” — What Is an Article V Convention? , Congress shall call such a convention. The BBA Con-Con Movement The Con-Con Rescission Movement So Special About the Constitution? ” The New BBA Con-Con Threat to the Constitution Over the next three years, some states that had rescinded their BBA Con-Con applications reapplied. BBA Con-Con applications. Thus, the Constitution is imperiled again by the possibility of a constitutional convention. This constitutes the new BBA Con-Con threat to the Constitution. A New Con-Con Rescission Movement All 27 states that have “ live ” BBA Con-Con applications are high priority for rescission movements. These seven states have Con-Con rescission resolutions that are still in effect and not overridden by later reapplications for a BBA Article V convention.

— In “ The Resurgent BBA Con-Con Drive History of the BBA Con-Con Movement .... Once again, bringing the federal government back into compliance with the powers granted to it by the Constitution was never in the picture. Furthermore, it must be emphasized that if the federal government would only follow the Constitution, then the budget would easily be brought into balance. What ’s one of the most noticeable aspects of this being “ out-of-control ”? That ’s exactly what happened. Our problem of an “ out-of-control ” government should be described as our “ out-of-compliance-with-the-Constitution ” federal government. Instead, a BBA would have the perverse effect of legitimizing the federal government ’s usurpations of powers not granted to it by the Constitution. ” “ ” Arguments Against a BBA Article V Convention •

" " The stakes are very high with this Article V convention issue! An Article V convention is the second method provided in the Constitution for proposing amendments. Twenty-seven amendments have been added to the Constitution since 1787. One, Two, Three 1. The Constitution Is Not the Problem. Constitutional convention proponents appear to be very concerned about upholding the Constitution. What we are actually facing is an “ out-of-compliance-with-the-Constitution ” government. Therefore, the Constitution is not the problem, and changing the Constitution with an Article V convention is not the solution. Is there no virtue among us? 2. 3. These “ Perhaps, that is, it is time to rewrite our Constitution. ” “ ” The solution is the Constitution, not Article V.

Once the applications from 34 states are received, Congress is constitutionally bound to “ call a convention for proposing amendments. Under the “ ” Leading the pack is Lawrence Lessig, who founded Call a Convention in August 2013. The platform is the convention. Among those on CFA ’s advisory council is Lawrence Lessig. “ All elections must be publicly financed. Halfway through her talk she stated, “ Convention USA ’s advisory board includes Lawrence Lessig. — Perhaps, that is, it is time to rewrite our Constitution. Lessig responded that any “ crazy amendments ” proposed at a convention would still need to be ratified by 38 states. ” A “ runaway ” convention does not scare Lessig; it is precisely what motivates him. The Left ’s deceptive quest to rewrite the Constitution ”

Of course, the Convention of States ( COS ), the Compact for America, and other Article V proponents on the right, argue up and down that they are not calling for a new constitutional convention. James Madison is called the Father of the Constitution, but is he really? That blueprint and the Constitution that was eventually approved at that convention have very little in common. ’s influence over the Article V convention movement. Balanced budget amendments, term limit amendments, and the various other “ power to the people ” amendments backed by the socialist wing of the Article V movement are all, in one way or another, contrary to the intent of the Founders and to the principles of liberty they enshrined in the Constitution.

Tweet by Shirley Spellerberg on August 4, 2017 at 3:57 PM My long-time Eagle Forum friend, Orlean Koehle, wrote this enlightening article about the Leftists and Leftist organizations that are pushing for a Convention of the States. The COS call for a Balanced Budget Amendment would give the SCOTUS control over taxing and spending in the event of a congressional inability to reach agreement and would violate the separation of powers policy. The following article by my long-time Eagle Forum friend Orlean Koehle, should be an eye-opener to those who would like to think for themselves instead of simply following the big-name conservatives Behind COS Project. Orlean Koehle has been the State President of Eagle Forum of California since 2002. Needs Revival, Not Revision, Dangers and Threats of an Article V Convention Issues:

WHAT IS A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION? ” One of the most serious problems Article V proposes is a runaway convention. There is no enforceable mechanism to prevent a convention from reporting out wholesale changes to our Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Convention could fundamentally change our Constitution or replace it altogether. I see no reason to believe that a constitutional convention, 200 years later, could be more narrowly circumscribed. Selection of Delegates for the constitutional convention is undefined in the plain language of Article V. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ “ Our intention is to protect the Constitution.